Purpose To evaluate the educational validity of two bench-top simulators for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) and Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURB), focusing on their realism, ergonomics, and relevance for structured endourology training. Materials and methods Fourteen expert endourologists from multiple European centers assessed both simulators during the European Association of Urology Residents Education Programme (EUREP) 2025. Face validity and content validity were evaluated using 4-point Likert questionnaires. Item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI/Ave) content validity indices were calculated for all items and adjusted for core procedural skills. Results Experts rated both simulators highly for anatomical realism, tissue handling, and overall utility (mean scores > 3.5/4). The TURP simulator achieved an adjusted S-CVI/Ave of 0.92 and the TURB simulator 0.97, indicating excellent consensus on their educational adequacy for key procedural steps. Non-modeled features such as bleeding, obturator reflex, and energy modulation received low ratings, reflecting inherent limitations of bench-top simulation. Both models were considered effective for practicing instrument handling and resection depth control in a risk-free, standardized environment. Conclusions The TURP and TURB simulators demonstrated strong face and content validity for core resection training. Their modular, non-biological, and reproducible design supports safe, structured skill acquisition and competency assessment in endourology curricula, offering a practical bridge between theoretical learning and clinical performance.